Nearly three years after a violent stabbing spree terrorized the UC Davis campus community, the second trial of Carlos Reales Dominguez is finally underway. Opening statements began Thursday morning at the Yolo County Superior Courthouse, with prosecutors preparing to make their case once more — but this time with a different legal landscape.
The 2023 attacks left two men dead and a woman severely injured, sending shockwaves through the college town. Dominguez was captured nearly a week after the first stabbing, but his initial trial last year ended in a stalemate. The jury found him not guilty of first-degree murder but couldn’t reach unanimous agreement on other charges, forcing the judge to declare a mistrial. That split verdict actually works against prosecutors now: double jeopardy protections mean they can no longer pursue the most serious charge. The best they can do this time is second-degree murder — a significant downgrade that reflects the legal constraints of a retrial.
The defense strategy remains rooted in mental health. Dominguez’s attorney argued previously that he suffered from untreated schizophrenia and was experiencing his first psychotic episode when the attacks occurred. That argument resonated enough with at least some jurors to derail the first conviction attempt. Whether the same case will work twice remains an open question, especially as prosecutors presumably refine their approach based on what fell flat the first time around.
What’s striking here is the tension between two competing narratives of culpability. One demands accountability for calculated, deliberate harm. The other asks whether a mind in acute crisis — untreated, unraveling — can be held to the same standard as a person acting with full rational agency. The jury’s inability to decide wasn’t indecision; it was a genuine philosophical disagreement about what the facts meant. This retrial will test whether opening arguments can shift that balance.
The trial is expected to run 12 weeks. That’s a substantial investment of time and resources for Yolo County, but it reflects the stakes of the case — and the complexity of determining guilt in circumstances where mental illness and violence intersect. Davis residents have waited long enough for resolution. Now comes the harder part: deciding what justice actually looks like.
About the Author
Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.






