Four years after the deadliest mass shooting in Sacramento’s history, the courtroom drama is zeroing in on one of the murkiest questions in criminal justice: how reliable is a witness who was there—but barely remembers being there?
On April 3, 2022, six people died and 12 more were injured in the shooting that unfolded along K Street, a corridor known for its nightlife. Now, in May 2026, prosecutors and defense attorneys are battling over the testimony of a man identified only by his initials, OW, who was shot that night. His account—or what he can recall of it—could be pivotal. He claims he saw one of the shooters, Smiley Martin, wearing a“Backwoods”sweatshirt. He also previously told detectives he was concerned about a man with a gun who approached him and asked“where you from?”—a question that carries heavy weight in certain contexts. But here’s the catch: OW was heavily intoxicated. He doesn’t remember much of that night at all.
This is where the trial gets messy. Prosecutors pointed to surveillance video and OW’s prior statements to establish that he identified both Smiley Martin and Dandrae Martin and saw a firearm before shots erupted. The defense countered by hammering the obvious: how much faith should a jury place in a drunk man’s memory? They suggested OW may have simply gone along with what police suggested during questioning—a phenomenon known as confirmation bias, and it’s a legitimate concern.
Detective Shaun McGovern took the stand Wednesday and testified that based on social media videos, he believed Smiley Martin had placed a gun into his waistband. But even McGovern’s interpretation of grainy video evidence is open to debate. Meanwhile, the other three people killed in the gunfight—DeVazia Turner, Sergio Harris, and Joshua Hoye-Lucchesi—aren’t classified as victims under California law because they participated in the shooting, a distinction that highlights just how tangled this case is.
The core question haunting this trial cuts deeper than just K Street: was this a gang-related confrontation that spiraled into violence, or were friends hanging out when a conversation went tragically wrong? With Smiley Martin dead in prison since 2024, the jury is deciding the fates of Mtula Payton and Dandrae Martin on evidence that includes fragmented memories, surveillance footage, and social media videos—all pieces that don’t always fit neatly together.
As Detective McGovern continues sharing his investigative findings, jurors will have to weigh how much credibility to give OW, how much to trust video interpretation, and ultimately, what actually happened on that chaotic night when Sacramento’s street culture turned lethal.
About the Author
Andrew Johnson
Andrew Johnson is a contributor to LocalBeat, covering local news and community stories.






