San Francisco has kicked off a legal battle against some of the biggest names in the food industry, citing ultraprocessed snacks as culprits in a growing public health crisis. City Attorney David Chiu isn’t pulling any punches, taking aim at well-known brands like Coca-Cola and Nestle, as well as popular treats like Oreo cookies and Lunchables. Chiu argues that these products are not only contributing to serious diseases like Type 2 diabetes and cancer but are also engineered to keep us craving more.
The lawsuit highlights how ultraprocessed foods are composed of cheap, chemically treated ingredients, with absolutely no resemblance to the whole foods we know are good for us. These companies have profited handsomely while consumers are left to deal with the fallout in terms of health crises. Chiu’s office is seeking to hold these brands accountable, demanding changes in marketing practices—especially ads aimed at kids—and calling for better consumer education on the risks.
This lawsuit isn’t just about snacks; it’s about responsibility and transparency in the marketing of food products. With more than half of Americans’ calories coming from ultraprocessed foods, it seems this showdown could lead to some serious reevaluation—both for the brands and for our snack choices. Are we ready for a snack revolution?
About the Author
Andrew Johnson
hello I'm Andrew and I built LocalBeat!
